Κυβερνοασφάλεια και τεχνητή νοημοσύνη στην ψηφιοποίηση της δικαιοσύνης
Cybersecurity and artificial intelligence in the digitalization of justice

View/ Open
Keywords
Ηλεκτρονική δικαιοσύνη ; Ποινικό δίκαιο ; Νέες τεχνολογίεςAbstract
Τhis thesis examines two of the most pivotal parameters shaping the contemporary landscape of digital justice: Artificial Intelligence and Cybersecurity. The starting point of the analysis is the observation that judicial systems can no longer remain stagnant in the face of rapid technological evolution, making it clear that the digitalization of justice is not an option, but a necessity.
The first chapter analyzes the electronic justice (e-Justice) ecosystem, with reference to the main European cross-border interoperability tools, such as EUR-Lex, N-Lex, e-CODEX, and ECRIS, as well as the Greek digitalization systems, such as OSDDY-DD and the electronic filing of legal documents. In the second chapter, the role of Artificial Intelligence in judicial function is explored, from the basic concepts of machine learning and deep learning to its real- world applications: digital courtrooms, smart courts in China, Estonia's project for automated small claims resolution, and the e-Curia platform. At the same time, the impact of AI on the right to a fair trial, the principle of the "lawful judge," and procedural justice is examined under the light of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights and the ECHR.
The third chapter is dedicated to cybersecurity as a fundamental guarantee for the operation of the digital judicial system. The European regulatory framework is analyzed, from the NIS 1 to the NIS 2 Directive, as well as the Greek legislative arsenal, while particular emphasis is placed on the relationship between Artificial Intelligence and Cybersecurity within the framework of the AI Act. This is followed by a brief reference regarding cybercrime and its treatment by criminal justice: phishing, pharming, hacking, deepfakes as evidence, as well as the criminal protection of personal data based on Law 4624/2019 and the GDPR. In the fifth and final chapter, the key challenges posed by the use of AI in justice are recorded, algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, the risk of replacing the judge and proposed solutions are sought that balance technological efociency with the protection of fundamental rights.
The central conclusion of the paper is that AI can contribute substantially to the modernization of justice, under the non-negotiable condition that it remains a tool for supporting, and not replacing, human judicial judgment. The principle of human control, the transparency of algorithmic systems, and robust cybersecurity are not technical details, but constitutional and procedural guarantees that do not permit compromise.


