Πως επηρεάζουν τα γεωχωρικά δεδομένα, οι οικονομικοί δείκτες και το ανθρώπινο κεφάλαιο τη χωρική-οικονομική ανθεκτικότητα στην Αττική
How geospatial data, economic indicators and human capital affect spatial-economic resilience in Attica

View/ Open
Keywords
Χωρική–οικονομική ανθεκτικότητα ; Αττική ; Γεωχωρικά δεδομένα ; Οικονομικοί δείκτες ; Ανθρώπινο κεφάλαιο ; Χωρική οικονομετρία ; Spatial–economic resilience ; Attica ; Geospatial data ; Economic indicators ; Human capital ; Spatial econometricsAbstract
This study examines how geospatial characteristics, economic structure, and human capital
are linked to the spatial-economic resilience of the 66 municipalities of Attica during the
period 2011–2021. Data from ELSTAT’s Population and Housing Censuses and Eurostat
GISCO’s LAU geometries are utilized. Resilience is measured using a composite index that
combines changes in employment, the economically active population, and unemployment.
The analysis includes descriptive statistics, mapping, Global Moran’s I, LISA, OLS models
with HC3 robust errors, and spatial SAR and SEM models.
Between 2011 and 2021, the population of Attica decreased by 0.38%, while
employment increased by 8.30% and unemployment fell from 18.03% to 12.47%. However,
these changes varied significantly among central, peri-urban, and island municipalities. The
resilience index exhibited positive spatial autocorrelation (Moran’s I = 0.371), with clusters of
high values primarily along western and eastern suburban corridors and low values in island
municipalities.
The basic OLS model explained 35.2% of the variance but exhibited
heteroscedasticity and spatially correlated residuals. Initial density had the strongest negative
relationship with recovery. SAR and SEM improved the fit and eliminated residual spatial
dependence, while the results for economic concentration and education proved to be
specification-sensitive. It is concluded that resilience is spatially heterogeneous and
interdependent; therefore, targeted, intermunicipal coordinated policies are required. The
study contributes to the municipal measurement of resilience by combining GIS, composite
indices, and spatial econometrics. The findings are interpreted as correlations, because the two
cross-sectional datasets, spatial aggregation, and proxy variables do not allow for reliable
causal conclusions.


