Η ιδιωτικότητα στην εποχή της τεχνητής νοημοσύνης υπό το πρίσμα του ψηφιακού ανθρωπισμού και του ψηφιακού συνταγματισμού
Privacy in the age of artificial intelligence under the prism of digital humanism and digital constitutionalism
![Thumbnail](/xmlui/bitstream/handle/unipi/17030/Mastrogianni_mdi2224.pdf.jpg?sequence=4&isAllowed=y)
View/ Open
Keywords
Τεχνητή νοημοσύνη ; Ψηφιακός ανθρωπισμός ; Ψηφιακός ανθρωπισμός ; Προστασία προσωπικών δεδομένων ; Κανονισμός για την τεχνητή νοημοσύνη ; e-Privacy ; Χάρτες δικαιωμάτων του διαδικτύου ; Προστατευτική νομολογία ; Μαζική επιτήρηση ; Συνταγματοποίηση ; Ψηφιακό περιβάλλον ; Γενικός Κανονισμός Προστασίας Δεδομένων (ΓΚΠΔ) ; ΙδιωτικότηταAbstract
This dissertation deals with the issue of privacy in the era of artificial intelligence in the light of two interconnected political and social movements, those of digital humanism and digital constitutionalism. Privacy in the age of artificial intelligence emerges as a critical issue as technology penetrates deeper into everyday life, collecting and processing vast amounts of personal data. In the light of digital humanism and digital constitutionalism, the protection of privacy takes on a double dimension. Digital humanism focuses on the need to preserve human dignity and autonomy in an environment where algorithms and AI systems can influence decisions and behaviour without the knowledge or consent of individuals. At the same time, digital constitutionalism seeks to establish new rules and governance frameworks that will limit the rampant power of large technology companies, while ensuring the protection of fundamental rights, such as privacy, through legislative and judicial intervention. The synergy between these two movements aims to create a technological ecosystem that is compatible with the principles of justice and privacy in the digital age.
Our analysis begins with privacy and data protection as enshrined in a variety of legal frameworks both internationally and nationally and continues with how privacy is secured in the age of artificial intelligence. After highlighting the relationship between digital humanism and digital constitutionalism, the bulk of the paper is devoted to approaching digital constitutionalism as both a conceptual and normative framework. Emphasis is placed on the role of judicial activism, large technology companies and civil society in the constitutionalisation of the digital society. Finally, we study two key texts, the proposed ePrivacy Regulation and the AI Regulation to highlight the contemporary approach to the issue of privacy and mass surveillance.